MBA admissions strategy & execution coaching
Your application should make one persuasive case. Most make none.
Strong candidates are rejected every year — not for lack of accomplishments, but because their application is fragmented, generic, or silent about its own risks. I work with two applicants per cycle to build one coherent, evidence-backed argument across every essay, recommendation, and interview answer.
Apply for a seatThe method
Diagnose. Position. Build. Pressure-test. Prepare.
Strategy comes before prose. We start by diagnosing your profile the way an admissions reader will: competitiveness, career logic, differentiation, and risk. Then we decide what every component must prove — and only then do we write.
This is not essay editing. It is an end-to-end partnership across school selection, narrative, essays, resume, recommendations, test strategy, and interviews — with substantial strategic work between sessions, not just during them.
How it worksProof
Small numbers, stated plainly.
Three clients so far, all word-of-mouth. Every one is at a school they were thrilled to attend — Kellogg, Columbia, and Darden — with an MIT Sloan admit and interviews or waitlists across the top tier along the way. Read the two stories that explain how: a single-school gamble on Columbia, and a nine-school stretch campaign that ended at the dream school.
Results & case studiesFit
Built for the strong-but-not-obvious admit.
My best work is with motivated candidates who have real raw material and one meaningful gap: a low GPA, an uneven test score, a nonlinear path, or a profile that reads impressive-but-generic. A well-built story can mitigate one gap; I'll tell you honestly when it can't. Strong profiles without a gap are welcome too — the method compounds an advantage just as well as it repairs a weakness. Either way: if you're willing to do the work, apply below.
Apply for a seat